The Angsty Gay
An alternative homosexual view on issues for gay individuals who don't buy into the stereotype. A place where matters of culture, politics, love, and the kitchen sink are observed through a mostly objective lens.
Thursday, June 2, 2011
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Saturday, May 7, 2011
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Monday, May 2, 2011
"I mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not
rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy. Returning hate
for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night
already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness:
only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can
do that" - Martin Luther King Jr.
rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy. Returning hate
for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night
already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness:
only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can
do that" - Martin Luther King Jr.
Saturday, April 30, 2011
Don't Say Gay, the destructive taboo
"Don't Say Gay," the latest anti-gay legislation soon to be introduced to the senate floor, would bar public school teachers k-8 from discussing anything related to homosexuality what so ever. The bill has already been passed in a Senate education panel, but I don't think we have anything to worry about... hopefully.
Sen. Campfield (R-TN) |
The bill is being proposed by republican Tennessee senator Stacey Campfield who says "My bill is neutral. It doesn’t say anybody can speak for it or against it. So, I’m sure people wouldn’t want someone coming out and saying, you know, there are some people who say, you know, we should be preaching against it and saying it’s evil, dirty and wrong, or some people say hey, it’s great, wonderful thing. I don't think it's appropriate."
This is blatant prejudice at work in our legal system. The bill states "No public elementary or middle school shall provide any instruction or material that discusses sexual orientation other than heterosexuality." If the bill were to be titled "Don't Say Black" and barred educators from speaking about anything to do with African Americans, people would label Campfield as a complete racist and he would probably be forced to resign.
There is a ridiculous double standard towards the gay community in our legal system. I find it utterly disgusting that Campfield has actually found a shred of support for this complete abomination of wasted tax dollars spent on discriminatory legislation.
The simple fact is, pretending that a group of people does not exist dehumanizes them. Creating a taboo around this subject would be sending a clear message to impressionable youth that being gay is wrong, that gay individuals are less than that of anyone else, and if a child may in fact be gay then they are unacceptable to our society. It would encourage bullying and intolerance, and would ultimately open a doorway for other forms of discrimination to follow.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Thursday, April 7, 2011
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Sunday, April 3, 2011
How I love the Onion News Network!
The Onion News Network has quickly become one of my new favorite TV shows. The entire show is set up as a satyrical news channel with a host of different anchors reporting on stories ranging from big government to gay rights and world hunger. You can catch the Onion on the Independent Film Channel at 10pm on Fridays (right before Portlandia!).
Saturday, April 2, 2011
The new it-beverage for spring.
One of Karen's crazy performances. |
I ventured to The Gym sports bar on 8th Avenue last night where the LGBT Absolut representatives were dishing out free samples of the new concoction. I found it slightly annoying that none of the reps seemed to be aware of the fact that it was a collaboration between Karen O and Absolut. Instead they featured some drag queen as the "LGBT friendly" face of Wild Tea. Further conversation with the reps revealed that they didn't even know who the Yeah Yeah Yeahs were (do your homework guys!). All in all the new flavor is really wonderful and best enjoyed with simple mixers like lemonade and San Pel. For those of you who haven't discovered Absolut Wild Tea or the Yeah Yeah Yeahs yet, try sipping a cocktail while enjoying one of their killer singles.
Best Yeah Yeah Yeahs song!
Oh Alanis!
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Why no one wants to be your "Gay best friend".
I have come across a handful of female individuals over the years who seem to think having a "gay best friend" is somehow a trendy new relationship to which any fashionable woman should partake in. However, I don't blame these women for thinking the way they do. I blame mainstream media, with it's stereotypical depictions of friendships between gay men and straight women that are so often portrayed in popular television shows such as Sex and the City, Glee, Will and Grace, and the horribly offensive Girls Who Like Boys Who Like Boys, just to name a few.
However, I must give some credit to these shows. Twenty years ago the simple idea of basing a television show around any gay character would have been met with instant dismissal by corporate networks. I do believe the gradual production of shows that include gay characters promotes a wider range of acceptance in our culture, but the reappearing stereotypes in these programs is causing some troubling controversy. Too many times have we witnessed overly flamboyant gay male characters who contribute no more than catty jokes and supportive advice to the usual female lead. Often we are portrayed as insecure, depressed and lonely as well. It is apparent that mainstream media doesn't care to advocate in favor of positive gay male role models. You won't find many put together, successful intelligent gay men on TV these days. This is a growing problem in our culture today that will ultimately have major negative repercussions on future gay generations if it is not repaired.
Last year Teen Vogue even went as far as naming the "gay best friend" or GBF as the "hot new accessory" for any fashionable teenage girl. The article stated that girls can be competitive with one another, and may feel insecure around their prettier more successful female friends. They went on to say that the solution to such problems is to acquire a "GBF". How dare Teen Vogue promote such a harmful stereotype? Why not run an article aimed at helping teenage girls overcome their insecurities, rather than subject a generation of young gay men to harmful objectification? Is our society really that fucked up or is it just me?
It is important to question the validity of any media which portrays gay men in a stereotypical fashion. We are slowly becoming desensitized to the subtle promotion of prejudice in every day life which is why it is crucial to view popular belief, as advertised through the mainstream, with an objective eye.
EXAMPLE A |
Last year Teen Vogue even went as far as naming the "gay best friend" or GBF as the "hot new accessory" for any fashionable teenage girl. The article stated that girls can be competitive with one another, and may feel insecure around their prettier more successful female friends. They went on to say that the solution to such problems is to acquire a "GBF". How dare Teen Vogue promote such a harmful stereotype? Why not run an article aimed at helping teenage girls overcome their insecurities, rather than subject a generation of young gay men to harmful objectification? Is our society really that fucked up or is it just me?
It is important to question the validity of any media which portrays gay men in a stereotypical fashion. We are slowly becoming desensitized to the subtle promotion of prejudice in every day life which is why it is crucial to view popular belief, as advertised through the mainstream, with an objective eye.
Monday, March 28, 2011
Saturday, March 26, 2011
The hypocrisy of it all
"If the Catholic Church believes marriage is a sacred institution then why do they refrain from protesting marriages between individuals of other faiths?"
Friday, March 25, 2011
Laura Bush killed a guy?!
Thursday, March 24, 2011
More verbal diarrhea from the New York archbishop this time.
What intrigues me the most is the fact that certain Catholics believe their church some how owns the right to Marriage. As if it is some sacred copy right to which no one can infringe upon. Reality check: we have separation of church and state for a reason. Marriage is first of all a legal union recognized by the state, to which religious ceremonies take the very back seat.
My favorite rhetorical argument the right wing loves to use in any forum is "If gays are allowed to marry then where do you draw the line? People will start marrying their relatives, pets, and even start practicing legal polygamy!"... Well the right wing along with the Catholic Church seems to love drawing lines every which way as to what you can and cannot do. They have been doing so throughout history, so why not give the left a turn?
My favorite rhetorical argument the right wing loves to use in any forum is "If gays are allowed to marry then where do you draw the line? People will start marrying their relatives, pets, and even start practicing legal polygamy!"... Well the right wing along with the Catholic Church seems to love drawing lines every which way as to what you can and cannot do. They have been doing so throughout history, so why not give the left a turn?
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
A Thought
"I don't believe any one label be it race, religion, sexuality or philosophy should ever define you so much so that it consumes everything else about you." - The Angsty Gay
Because Christianity doesn't generally vilify gays... right?
This week an important statement was introduced by the United Nations condemning homophobia spawned from institutions such as christianity. Archbishop Silvano Tomasi (shown below, left), was quoted during a talk with the Human Rights Council "People are being attacked for taking positions that do not support sexual behavior between people of the same sex. When they express their moral beliefs or beliefs about human nature they are stigmatized, and worse they are vilified, and persecuted."
I'm having a really hard time getting around the hypocrisy of this statement. Not only does Christianity as a whole promote anti-gay philosophy, but sects within the institution go as far as budgeting large amounts of money annually to limit rights to gay American citizens. It's a well known fact that Christianity condemns homosexuality, so why all of a sudden are Christians the victims? I'm glad at least we live in a country where people's opinions, no matter how undeniably hypocritical they are, can be expressed freely. Maybe Christians should try living as second class citizens and then maybe they'll see what it's really like to be attacked, stigmatized, vilified and persecuted.
I'm having a really hard time getting around the hypocrisy of this statement. Not only does Christianity as a whole promote anti-gay philosophy, but sects within the institution go as far as budgeting large amounts of money annually to limit rights to gay American citizens. It's a well known fact that Christianity condemns homosexuality, so why all of a sudden are Christians the victims? I'm glad at least we live in a country where people's opinions, no matter how undeniably hypocritical they are, can be expressed freely. Maybe Christians should try living as second class citizens and then maybe they'll see what it's really like to be attacked, stigmatized, vilified and persecuted.
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Portlandia, gender bending done right.
So this is a new sketch comedy show on the Independent Film Channel created by Fred Armisen (of SNL) and Carrie Brownstein. The show features a variety of characters including the couple in the clip below. What I love about this clip is the fact that Fred and Carrie switch gender roles, yet it's done in good humor so we can all share a laugh. Sarah McLachlan and Aimee Mann, two of my favorite angsty female songstresses, will be making cameos this season (along with many others).
Are we being taken advantage of by corporate advertisers?
Walking down Eighth Avenue in Chelsea you can't help but notice several advertisements geared towards male sexuality on each block. No where else in New York do you see men being objectified for commercial purposes. It's such a normality on Eighth Ave that I've become completely desensitized to it until now. This week I realized that perhaps us NYC gays are being taken advantage of by major corporations trying to sell various products such as clothing, steroids, online dating, pornography, ect. All things we don't really need, but are unfortunately sold in copious amounts in this part of town.
The fact that these items are so ubiquitous on Eighth Avenue doesn't really bother me. What really drives me crazy is the way they're advertised. We've all seen the barrage of posters featuring "perfectly" sculpted guys starring out with an aroused look in their eyes, and the suggestive texts attached to them. I can't help but think this display of so-called "perfect male body image" can slowly erode away at any guy's self esteem. However that's exactly their intention. They're letting you know that if you don't buy into whatever their selling that you should feel self conscious about your body and purchase whatever it is to make yourself worthy of attention. These advertisements represent millions upon millions of dollars worth of budgeting by corporations to make you feel shitty about yourself. But don't, for a second buy into this stereotypical idea.
Their is a huge problem in the gay community today concerning body image. So many of us are so deeply concerned with the way we look and I believe it's partly due to these marketing ploys. As a whole it is very easy for any entity concerned with making money to take advantage of the gay community in this fashion. Hopefully we can start to see a change in the way corporations treat our community. Instead of making us out to be a stereotypical over-sexed, body conscious group, we can begin to receive the respect we deserve. However, this respect can only be achieved if we decide to become our own catalyst. No longer can we support this shameless promotion of so-called "perfection".
Is it really necessary to market HIV testing with sex... Doesn't that seem a little contradictory? |
Monday, March 21, 2011
Former Nirvana drummer and lead vocalist of the Foo Fighters Dave Grohl can't stand Glee either!!!
It was reported, when approached by Glee producers, Dave Grohl had some interesting things to say about the show. Including, but not limited to: "It's every band's right, you shouldn't have to do f**king Glee. F**ck them for thinking anybody and everybody should want to do Glee."
I can't say I don't disagree with him, and anyways who can resist Dave Grohl mmmmmmm... Well maybe Dave Grohl 10 years ago.
P.S. Let's put a tack in Glee... I'll be adressing them promptly.
I can't say I don't disagree with him, and anyways who can resist Dave Grohl mmmmmmm... Well maybe Dave Grohl 10 years ago.
P.S. Let's put a tack in Glee... I'll be adressing them promptly.
WTF???!!!
What's up with matching trench coats in the middle of the desert?... Creepy. |
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Has social media ruined the coffee shop romance?
It was reported this year that one in three relationships (however brief or anonymous) started online. With the dawning age of social media upon us, is the gay community facing a challenging new crossroads? In just a few years will it even be possible to meet a soulmate outside the confines of the social network? Will the members of our community be socially competent enough to engage in just the first steps of starting a relationship apart from the online dating world?
When sending a digital message over a social dating forum you have a sense of detachment and safety knowing that there are little to no public consequences of rejection. In the real world when presented with a situation that requires you to approach another guy and break the initial, sometimes mortifying fear of instant public rejection, one is often hesitant to even glance in their direction. The barrier the internet provides between you and your fear of rejection is easy to succumb to. However, this disconnect from actual reality may have detrimental effects on a person's natural level of confidence. Relying heavily on social media as the potential catalyst for a relationship makes you less confident in your own ability to not only introduce yourself to another guy, but also to carry on a legitimate conversation and future relationship goals you might have (if it even gets that far with someone you've met online).
So you're sitting in Starbucks one afternoon and you notice the guy across the room taking brief glimpses in your direction. You make eye contact once or twice. Does it end here? Well that's up to you. Chances are he is just as afraid of rejection as the next guy, so the ball is in your court. What do you do? Try making extended eye contact a few moments past the point of comfort. Once the contact is broken look down and maybe look back to see if he's still looking, if so smile. Chances are you won't be able to make him come to you. You'll have to go to him. The proverbial frog must go to the fly in this situation. Walk over and ask to sit with him. If he says he'd rather not then oh well, water under the bridge, you never have to see him again. If he agrees then look at that, you have the opportunity to meet someone new. There is nothing to lose in this situation, and remember if he's looking he's probably interested.
Be this as it may, there are a few valid concepts about online dating that should be mentioned. There is no other place save online dating websites where you can instantly weed out dozens of guys who would not be compatible with you simply by viewing their profile. This notion allows you to find a guy who may seem to compliment you perfectly, but what must be taken into account is the other guy's perception of himself. Does his profile reflect who he truly is, or who he thinks he is. It's really impossible to tell.
However you see it, it's crucial to realize the importance of pure, one-on-one interaction, and the ways it can build confidence.
When sending a digital message over a social dating forum you have a sense of detachment and safety knowing that there are little to no public consequences of rejection. In the real world when presented with a situation that requires you to approach another guy and break the initial, sometimes mortifying fear of instant public rejection, one is often hesitant to even glance in their direction. The barrier the internet provides between you and your fear of rejection is easy to succumb to. However, this disconnect from actual reality may have detrimental effects on a person's natural level of confidence. Relying heavily on social media as the potential catalyst for a relationship makes you less confident in your own ability to not only introduce yourself to another guy, but also to carry on a legitimate conversation and future relationship goals you might have (if it even gets that far with someone you've met online).
So you're sitting in Starbucks one afternoon and you notice the guy across the room taking brief glimpses in your direction. You make eye contact once or twice. Does it end here? Well that's up to you. Chances are he is just as afraid of rejection as the next guy, so the ball is in your court. What do you do? Try making extended eye contact a few moments past the point of comfort. Once the contact is broken look down and maybe look back to see if he's still looking, if so smile. Chances are you won't be able to make him come to you. You'll have to go to him. The proverbial frog must go to the fly in this situation. Walk over and ask to sit with him. If he says he'd rather not then oh well, water under the bridge, you never have to see him again. If he agrees then look at that, you have the opportunity to meet someone new. There is nothing to lose in this situation, and remember if he's looking he's probably interested.
Be this as it may, there are a few valid concepts about online dating that should be mentioned. There is no other place save online dating websites where you can instantly weed out dozens of guys who would not be compatible with you simply by viewing their profile. This notion allows you to find a guy who may seem to compliment you perfectly, but what must be taken into account is the other guy's perception of himself. Does his profile reflect who he truly is, or who he thinks he is. It's really impossible to tell.
However you see it, it's crucial to realize the importance of pure, one-on-one interaction, and the ways it can build confidence.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)